<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Review: &#8220;Waiting for Godot&#8221; starring Sir Ian McKellen and Patrick Stewart</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.whirledpeas.eu/2009/05/17/review-waiting-for-godot-starring-sir-ian-mckellen-and-patrick-stewart/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.whirledpeas.eu/2009/05/17/review-waiting-for-godot-starring-sir-ian-mckellen-and-patrick-stewart/</link>
	<description>A Blog for the Environmentally Friendly</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2011 05:54:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.whirledpeas.eu/2009/05/17/review-waiting-for-godot-starring-sir-ian-mckellen-and-patrick-stewart/comment-page-1/#comment-90</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 18:40:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whirledpeas.eu/?p=859#comment-90</guid>
		<description>Love these two!  I also have found with great actors some of the most obscure plays come to life!  So glad you got to enjoy the extraordinary piece.

&lt;abbr&gt;&lt;em&gt;Chrisâ€™s last blog post..&lt;a href=&quot;http://writingandbeyond.blogspot.com/2009/05/new-arms.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;New Arms&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/abbr&gt;&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Love these two!  I also have found with great actors some of the most obscure plays come to life!  So glad you got to enjoy the extraordinary piece.</p>
<p><abbr><em>Chrisâ€™s last blog post..<a href="http://writingandbeyond.blogspot.com/2009/05/new-arms.html" rel="nofollow">New Arms</a></em></abbr></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Artaud's aunt</title>
		<link>http://www.whirledpeas.eu/2009/05/17/review-waiting-for-godot-starring-sir-ian-mckellen-and-patrick-stewart/comment-page-1/#comment-84</link>
		<dc:creator>Artaud's aunt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 20:57:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whirledpeas.eu/?p=859#comment-84</guid>
		<description>The text is very funny but it is also strange, poetic, bleak and thought provoking. This production goes for  mostly funny, supplemented by cosy, sentimental and an overarchingly comfortable &quot;There now, Beckett was really nothing to be afraid of, after all&quot;.  Unsurprising in an age where  former punk champions  of anarchy star in commercials for butter, I suppose . The funny stuff is  very expertly executed but the tragedy is barely allowed to intrude , for fear perhaps of spoiling the evening by making us, like Lucky, think for a few minutes.

I am curious at how many reviewers have dismissed Lucky&#039;s (only) speech as all , or mostly, gibberish. Its sense has always seemed perfectly clear to me : In spite of everything (catalogued in tortuous , fragmented, absurd and insane detail) we &quot;waste and pine&quot;. Life&#039;s a bitch (or a beach) then you die.
 The other three characters hurl him to the ground in their desire to silence him because they don&#039;t want to hear this. 

Neither, it would seem , do we . 

There is a difference between making something accessible to a wider audience and ripping out all its teeth . There are shedloads of wry sentimentality and endearing eccentricity to be had in television sitcoms.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The text is very funny but it is also strange, poetic, bleak and thought provoking. This production goes for  mostly funny, supplemented by cosy, sentimental and an overarchingly comfortable &#8220;There now, Beckett was really nothing to be afraid of, after all&#8221;.  Unsurprising in an age where  former punk champions  of anarchy star in commercials for butter, I suppose . The funny stuff is  very expertly executed but the tragedy is barely allowed to intrude , for fear perhaps of spoiling the evening by making us, like Lucky, think for a few minutes.</p>
<p>I am curious at how many reviewers have dismissed Lucky&#8217;s (only) speech as all , or mostly, gibberish. Its sense has always seemed perfectly clear to me : In spite of everything (catalogued in tortuous , fragmented, absurd and insane detail) we &#8220;waste and pine&#8221;. Life&#8217;s a bitch (or a beach) then you die.<br />
 The other three characters hurl him to the ground in their desire to silence him because they don&#8217;t want to hear this. </p>
<p>Neither, it would seem , do we . </p>
<p>There is a difference between making something accessible to a wider audience and ripping out all its teeth . There are shedloads of wry sentimentality and endearing eccentricity to be had in television sitcoms.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bassagirl</title>
		<link>http://www.whirledpeas.eu/2009/05/17/review-waiting-for-godot-starring-sir-ian-mckellen-and-patrick-stewart/comment-page-1/#comment-83</link>
		<dc:creator>Bassagirl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 15:42:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whirledpeas.eu/?p=859#comment-83</guid>
		<description>Two great actors, I wish I had been there!   It&#039;s interesting how some plays don&#039;t stand out on the page at all.  I guess because many of us encounter works such as this one by reading them first (which is of course much cheaper) we usually expect them to be much more than a blueprint for actors and directors needing a great collaborative effort to make them outstanding.     For me, this post raises the question of how can we make a play or any work of art accessible in ways that can contribute to the lives of the many over the few?  I do think a lot of what Becket has to say with this play is important but if it is presented in a way that is unengaging to us, we might lose out.

&lt;abbr&gt;&lt;em&gt;Bassagirlâ€™s last blog post..&lt;a href=&quot;http://bassabassa.blogspot.com/2009/05/pleading-for-desert.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Pleading for the Desert (1961)&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/abbr&gt;&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Two great actors, I wish I had been there!   It&#8217;s interesting how some plays don&#8217;t stand out on the page at all.  I guess because many of us encounter works such as this one by reading them first (which is of course much cheaper) we usually expect them to be much more than a blueprint for actors and directors needing a great collaborative effort to make them outstanding.     For me, this post raises the question of how can we make a play or any work of art accessible in ways that can contribute to the lives of the many over the few?  I do think a lot of what Becket has to say with this play is important but if it is presented in a way that is unengaging to us, we might lose out.</p>
<p><abbr><em>Bassagirlâ€™s last blog post..<a href="http://bassabassa.blogspot.com/2009/05/pleading-for-desert.html" rel="nofollow">Pleading for the Desert (1961)</a></em></abbr></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

